Monday, May 3, 2010

OMG... WTF?: One blogger's view of interesting times

We are living in interesting times – this, reputed, Chinese curse is supposed to be the rough equivalent of giving someone the Evil Eye.

Don’t get me wrong. For a radical social critic, “interesting times” make for ripe pickings. In fact, today’s superheated political climate provides a veritable “embarrassment of riches”:

And the list goes on…


The election of Barack Obama was supposed to usher in a new era of “change we could believe in.” But the promises Candidate Obama are barely recognizable in the policies of the Obama administration: his neoliberal-inspired economic stimulus funded a bank-bailout and jobless recovery, while his health care reform has delivered millions to private insurers, his plans for education include privatization and punishing teachers, and his lukewarm efforts on behalf of the undocumented have angered Latinos. Yet, faced with the cavernous shortfall between Obama’s espoused values and the values-enacted thus far in his presidency, many progressives are reasonably upset about the latest liberal betrayal.

Demands for progressive social and economic justice must navigate a steady – and well-funded – barrage of exaggeration, distortion, misdirection, and fabrication. Indeed, the forces of reaction have become quite adept at clothing their agenda as benign – even beneficial – while painting all opposition as “naïve,” “misguided,” “disingenuous,” and “un-American.” And just as the US invasion of Iraq was founded on a barefaced lie, the TEAbagger’s over-the-top opposition to healthcare reform was fueled by outrageous claims about government death panels and socialism, and the fact of persistent racial disparities eagerly pounced upon as proofs of Black inferiority – a justification for a public policy of not-so-benign neglect.

Adding insult to injury, our current crop of Black Public Intellectuals is so obviously addicted to ink and face-time, they'll say almost anything for that next fix. In a recent NYT op-ed by Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates – a protagonist in the notorious White House “beer summit,” has suggested that any debate over Black Reparations first must consider the culpability of long-dead African kingdoms – lands and peoples subsequently colonized/exploited by their former business partners, lands and peoples that remain largely trapped in their own colonial histories and subject to hostile post-colonial, global realities. Inexplicably, Gates has assigned the task of securing apologies – and a payment plan – from a number of singularly unstable West African regimes.

That said, Gates’ spin on “blame” misses the point: the reparations movement is not primarily concerned with Pay-Back, the real issue is Pay-Up. “Reparations” encompasses an array of policies, programs, and actions that will remove all remaining barriers to the full inclusion of AfrAms in America's common wealth – however long it takes, and at whatever cost. And, contrary to popular wisdom on that whitewashed icon celebrated each January, this demand rooted in Dr. M.L. King's bold and uncompromising frontal assault on racism-war-poverty (his Evil Triplets). One need only reread the text of MLK's “Dream” speech – which might just as readily been titled “America’s Promissory Note, Long Past Due” – to understand today's demand that America finally make good on its promises.

These are exciting, confusing, and dangerous times. And our response to this vexing confusion, this blogger is reminded of another Chinese proverb: “the beginning of wisdom is calling things by their correct names.” Ω

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Flea-ing Glenn Beck

i watched an entire hour of Glenn Beck last night (2AM). he was at his blackboard, building a case for Obama's “socialism” - weaving themes of abandonement, childhood exposure to Marxist thinking (his parents, grandparents, & a Black mentor), and his continuing ties to folks with Marxist-leanings (as expected, Rev. Wright & Van Jones – also throwing SojournersJim Wallis into his conspiracy brew). curiously, Beck failed to even mention of BO’s “pal,” Bill Ayers – perhaps tonight.
any-way, claiming that he really admired the president’s intelligence, was only engaging in some “honest questioning” of POTUS’s free-market credentials. Beck concluded that, given Obama’s unstable family life and childhood exposure, how could the poor man become anything other than a Marxist bent on “fundamental transformation of America.”

in all fairness, Beck was more subued than i've ever seen him. this isn’t to say that his case wasn’t as loopy as ever, just that his usual theatrics (tears & bombast) were toned way-y-y down. it struck me with that the word “sedition” swirling around media coverage of Christian milia cultmembers - with ties to Timothy McVeigh’s Michigan alma mater - might have had a sobering effect on the tone and amplification (if not the content) of Beck’s usual performance.

as i watched in fascination, an old memory stirred, and Beck was revealed as the ringmaster of a flea circus, skillfully directing audience attention to a set of props fabricated to convince that there were highly-trained fleas, riding bicycles, swinging on trapezes, walking the highwire, & lifting great weights ...
i suddenly recalled a passage from C.W. Mills’ (1956) The Power Elite:
“below the elite...are those professional celebrities who live by being continually displayed...[they] are not at the head of any dominating hierarchy [but] have the power to distract...[agitate] the masses...[and] gain the ear of those who do occupy positions of direct power...such celebrities and consultants [e.g., Beck, Palin, Hoover, AEI] are part of the immediate scene in which the drama of the elite is enacted. But that drama itself is centered in the command posts of the major institutional hierarchies.”
Uh-huh … coming to a TEA Party fundraiser near you, check out at the Evil Kineval flea on that miniature motorcycle doing a loop-de-loop while Sarah Palin sings “Leader of the pack.
“Glenn Beck': Will White House Refute Beck's Evidence?”